G. Dimitrov
To Win
J. Fearnley
To Win
Grigor Dimitrov vs Facundo Bagnis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W L W
Form
L L W W L L L W W LHead-2-Head: Dimitrov 2 - 0 Bagnis
They have played 5 sets in total, with Dimitrov winning 4 and Bagnis winning 1. The last match between Dimitrov and Bagnis was at the Melbourne Summer Set - Melbourne, 06-01-2022, Second, Hard with Grigor Dimitrov getting the victory 5-7 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Grigor Dimitrov | 2 |
| Facundo Bagnis | 0 |
Melbourne Summer Set - Melbourne(06-01-2022)
5
7
7
6
6
3
| Dimitrov | Stats | Bagnis |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (13-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (2-2) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 16 | Ranking | 399 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 55 |
| 33 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 19 | Titles | 22 |
| 62% (606-366) | Career Total W/L | 59% (640-443) |
| $19,588,595 | Career Prize Money | $1,274,440 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Facundo Bagnis
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
11
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Facundo Bagnis
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 21 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:26:32 | Average Match Time | 1:26:32 |
| 62% (87/141) | 1st Serve % | 63% (109/174) |
| 79% (69/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (66/109) |
| 52% (28/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (33/65) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 43% (75/174) | Return Points Win % | 31% (44/141) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Grigor Dimitrov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Nicolas Jarry
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Valentin Vacherot
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Nicolas Jarry
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
61%
(
66 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Karen Khachanov
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
13
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
53 of
70)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
22%
(
21 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Federico Cina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Facundo Bagnis
83%
(
65 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-6(3) 4-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Renzo Olivo
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
9
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gonzalo Villanueva
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Estevez
Player
Facundo Bagnis
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
57%
(
26 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36
Total Points Won
45
|
1-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Facundo Bagnis
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
80 of
125)
7
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
8
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
49 of
80)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Facundo Bagnis
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
12
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Facundo Bagnis
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (606/366) | Win/Loss | 59% (640/443) |
| 59% (1467/1004) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1444/1103) |
| 53% (12946/11401) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12719/11516) |
| 63% (268/159) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (38/61) |
| 62% (161/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (601/371) |
| 63% (125/73) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 59% (52/36) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/9) |
| 0.49 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 5802 | Aces Total | 3630 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2846 | Total Double Faults | 2992 |
| 1:30:29 | Average Match Time | 1:22:31 |
| 411.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 519.34 |
| 62% (40511/65295) | 1st Serve % | 61% (38688/63498) |
| 75% (30460/40511) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (26892/38688) |
| 52% (12771/24784) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (12551/24801) |
| 38% (2278/5923) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2702/6288) |
| 37% (24844/66707) | Return Points Win % | 40% (25178/62688) |
| 63% (101/59) | Slam W/L | 42% (33/46) |
| 60% (159/107) | Masters W/L | 50% (13/13) |
| 82% (14/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 61% (217/137) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (110/95) |
| 100% (5/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (62/39) | Challenger W/L | 64% (400/229) |
| 71% (47/19) | Futures W/L | 59% (84/58) |
| 62% (498/802) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (622/1033) |
| 65% (102/157) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 54% (248/460) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (163/344) |
| 59% (190/320) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (210/366) |
| 86% (572/492) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (613/531) |
| 13% (572/76) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (613/81) |
| 28% (400/113) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (470/108) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
